Friday, October 10, 2003
Why rock 'n roll guys get all the girls
Warning: Fallacious reasoning in operation here. (First, the obvious truth: rock 'n roll guys don't get all the girls.)
And unfortunately this article does nothing to approach or explain the inverse, why certain musical trends (for example let's say the new romantics rather than jimi hendrix) meet with any success being a big pant-hoot while completely devoid of the nutritious fruit.
Otherwise, this article (a little bit scattered in approach and not really demonstrating the conclusion promised by the title and the lead-in) is interesting in so far is it collects and sticks in a variety of obscure data. The very act of preparing an article drawing broad parallels invites the idea that music should generate and attract some form of activity (in this article, he's suggesting brain activity) in addition to boom-chicka boom-chicka boom-chicka.
¶ 10/10/2003 08:42:00 AM
Warning: Fallacious reasoning in operation here. (First, the obvious truth: rock 'n roll guys don't get all the girls.)
And unfortunately this article does nothing to approach or explain the inverse, why certain musical trends (for example let's say the new romantics rather than jimi hendrix) meet with any success being a big pant-hoot while completely devoid of the nutritious fruit.
Otherwise, this article (a little bit scattered in approach and not really demonstrating the conclusion promised by the title and the lead-in) is interesting in so far is it collects and sticks in a variety of obscure data. The very act of preparing an article drawing broad parallels invites the idea that music should generate and attract some form of activity (in this article, he's suggesting brain activity) in addition to boom-chicka boom-chicka boom-chicka.
¶ 10/10/2003 08:42:00 AM
