Another very telling part when writing about music can be the editorial decision to not just concentrate on the happy/good parts. That decision should also be expanded to include looking at our collective past. There's always a lot of dirt to be dished, which inevitably will make some people uncomfortable, but some forms of examination make the ways we look at music and the world of make-believe that "music" creates just seem more honest. Writers can do this by listening for the notes that are played between the keys, or by giving the mic to the people whose voices are far removed but essential background for the chorus.

a benefit record ten tears after

For instance, a savvy writer or an astute cultural scholar could have at the time of release made much of this benefit record, but probably none now ever will because the record is an ancient hit, and this article is uncomfortable to read.

Rather than sanitizing and making palatable by continuing to give attention to one side of the story (with the social pre-requisites of achievement and humanitarianism on one side and/or ongoing identification with "outlaw" sub-cultures on the other), such facets are necessary when examining the full range of culture.

Being achievement-oriented figures, who give a lot of lip service to celebrating human potential (and so re-validating themselves in the process), many celebrities lately appear able only to understand and respect (and want to help) all the wrong people.
  ¶ 1/14/2003 05:28:00 PM